鶹ý

Podcast: 10th Anniversary for HealthNewsReview.org

— Gary Schwitzer reflects on high points, low points, lessons learned

MedpageToday

In the spring of 2005, then-president of the then- (FIMDM) approached me looking for ideas. He wanted to bring ideas to his Board about how to reach the broader patient population beyond those that FIMDM was reaching with its condition-specific shared decision-making programs (which I had helped produce throughout the '90s as an employee of FIMDM based at Dartmouth Medical School).

I immediately told him how much I admired a fledgling , which was systematically reviewing healthcare news coverage in that country. I thought the FIMDM mission of improving patient decision-making and the Media Doctor mission of improving media messages about healthcare intersected. Fowler got the picture immediately, sold his Board on the idea, and granted me the first of 8 years of funding.

After a year of planning and building the team of reviewers and the website, we launched HealthNewsReview.org on April 17, 2006.

I have always been blessed by having a terrific team of contributors – about 70 different people at one time or another. But four have been with me during the entire time: , and Drs. , and .

I wanted you to be able to hear from all four in this 10th anniversary podcast. It is the industry-independent expertise of people like this that gave our project immediate street cred 10 years ago, with a reputation that has grown ever since.

Some stats and historical notes:

  • We have published 4,600 articles in 10 years.
  • We've , gained a ton of followers, made a lot of friends (and a few enemies, which is going to happen when you do this kind of work for 10 years).
  • The four mentioned above are part of – only three of whom are full-time. It's a mix of journalists, clinician-researchers, and others trained in the evaluation of evidence – including three women with breast cancer trained in the National Breast Cancer Coalition's Project LEAD training.

Low points:

  • Being warned by my university department head prior to launch in 2005 not to pursue this project because I'd never get tenure if I did.
  • Going 19 months without funding from 2013-2014, and keeping the site alive only by my own blogging.

High points:

  • Eight years of funding from the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making.
  • Earning tenure in 2007 based primarily on the accomplishments of this project, which I had been warned not to pursue! (As it turns out, tenure became irrelevant when I resigned my faculty job to work on this project full-time.)
  • While teetering on the brink of shutdown in 2014, having the Laura and John Arnold Foundation approach me about prospects for new funding.
  • The phoenix-like comeback of 2015 with an expanded, invigorated team of contributors, the new feature of reviewing health care PR news (press) releases, and an explosion in traffic to the site.

Lessons learned: countless – about marching to the beat of my own drummer, about perseverance, about how media messages can help or harm the public dialogue about healthcare, and about how you can attract more flies with honey than with vinegar.

In a talk I gave last week, I used this slide to try to explain why we've stuck with this for 10 years.

schwitzerslide

Thanks to for providing us with a grant to produce these podcasts. This post originally appeared on .